https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453
Matthieu Schaller <matthieu.schaller at durham dot ac.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Matthieu Schaller <matthieu.schaller at durham dot ac.uk>
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Adding an inline variant is unlikely a win. As noted by Joseph a "builtin"
> is not what you expect. No CPU I am aware of has a cbrt operation
> implemented in hardware.
Agreed that there are no chip-level instructions but surely an inlined set of
assembly instructions in the code will be faster than a function call to this
same set of assembly instructions within the libm, no?
