https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593
--- Comment #10 from n8tm at aol dot com --- Jerry , Thanks for the efforts and apparent progress. I will return to wired internet territory and the win10 box next weekend. I have the win8.1 laptop here. Sent via the ASUS PadFone X mini, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original Message -------- From:"jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> Sent:Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:03:55 -0400 To:tpri...@computer.org Subject:[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 > >--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >(In reply to tprince from comment #8) >> I show my configure parameters in my test results posts. At some time in >> the past, each of them has been important. I don't know if the parameters >> quoted by cygwin release pertain to cross compiling. As the parameters I >> use have been successful again last week on win8.1 I don't see how they >> might pertain to the f951 bootstrap failure on win10. When I get back to >> the win10 box I will compare with disable bootstrap. > >Tim, using your parameters I was able to build. I proceeded to do a regression >hunt and confirmed that it was at the DTIO patch on 8/31/2016. > >In this patch we added two new functions to libgfortran and set the symbol >versioning. I modified the library by inserting a printf("ping\n") in the code >path for a simple program. > >print *, "hello" >end > >The ping does not show which means the wrong library is being used at run time. > >I am trying various config and bath settings to see if I can sort it out. No >luck so far. > >-- >You are receiving this mail because: >You reported the bug.
