https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78166
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-11-01, at 1:22 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote: > #1 is easy and John has a patch for that. I've prototyped #3, but don't > really > like it. I think going with #1 on the trunk and backported to gcc-6 is > probably best. Thanks very much for the analysis. I'll commit my change. PS: I started on trying to implement lra but it's not going to be easy... -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
