https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78439

--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #8)
> Does something like that work?
> 
> --- gcc/config/arm/vfp.md.orig        2016-11-10 11:38:03.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/config/arm/vfp.md     2016-11-22 10:28:33.724941776 +0100
> @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@
>  )
>  
>  (define_insn "*movdi_vfp_cortexa8"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand"
> "=r,r,r,r,r,r,m,w,!r,w,w, Uv")
> -       (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand"             
> "r,rDa,Db,Dc,mi,mi,r,r,w,w,Uvi,w"))]
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand"
> "=r,r,r,r,q,q,m,w,!r,w,w, Uv")
> +       (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand"             
> "r,rDa,Db,Dc,mi,mi,q,r,w,w,Uvi,w"))]
>    "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && arm_tune == TARGET_CPU_cortexa8
>      && (   register_operand (operands[0], DImode)
>          || register_operand (operands[1], DImode))

Yes, that is what I'm testing.
I'll send it to gcc-patches soon

Reply via email to