https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So, %ebx doesn't hold 1 as it is supposed to, but 1 << %ecx (64). > Vlad, could you please have a look? It is a bug in a new optimization (invariant inheritance) which I added this summer. The optimization is important for PPC. So it will take more time to fix it than usual. Still ETA is the next week.
