https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
> If the libstdc++ approach works and is acceptable, it seems to me we should do
> the same for libgo.
Fine with me: it has the advantage of solving both the libgo.a and
libgo.so problems in the same way with a mechanism known to work and not
harm other targets.
I'll cook up a patch.
Rainer
