https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977

--- Comment #13 from Hannes Hauswedell <h2+bugs at fsfe dot org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> So that looks like r244037 has fixed this bug.  Please reopen if that is not
> the case.  Given Martin's description that
> 2.99999999999999988897769753748434595763683319091796875e-1 could be printed
> with %g as
> 0.299999 or as 0.3 depending on rounding, assuming range [3, 8] is
> reasonable, hardcoding return value of 8 is obviously wrong.

Ok, great, then we will just wait. Otherwise I would have done more of the
debugging, but I am also quite busy so we'll wait for the weekly snapshots!

Reply via email to