https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78068
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |69968
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I had a go at fixing this by introducing a "require_close_matches" flag to
best_match (When set, it would require an edit distance of 1), and turning it
on for just this warning.
Unfortunately this broke the scanf<->sacnf transposition detection in one of
the testcases.
Maybe this would be a valid approach if we implemented transposition handling
when computing the edit distance. (transposition-handling is PR 69968).
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
[Bug 69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than
Levenshtein
