https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79287
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oliver Kiddle from comment #2)
> The interpretation of the string being outside the scope of the standard
> doesn't stop this being an issue. Should I, as an outsider, interpret a
> WONTFIX resolution as meaning that you regard it as something that should
> not be changed - it is intended behavior - or merely that you as an
> individual are not motivated to fix it yourself. In the case of the former,
> some explanation would be nice and in the latter case, I'd have thought that
> leaving the issue open with a note to indicate whether a patch would be
> welcomed would be more helpful.
Patches are always welcomed. WONTFIX here means that there is simply
not enough developers to address the 800+ Fortran bugs. This bug is
deemed to be a nonissue, because it is processor defined behavior
and you can use a -I option to find the file.
> To further elaborate on the issue, note that the preprocessor does work in
> the manner I suggest. The documentation for the -I option even states that
> "the general behavior of -I and "INCLUDE" is pretty much the same as of -I
> with "#include" in the cpp preprocessor.
Yeah, there are bugs in the documentation. We accept patches
to the docs as well.
