https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79531
Bug ID: 79531
Summary: bad location when trying to define undeclared method
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider this source:
=======
struct base {
virtual void m() = 0;
};
struct derived : public base {
virtual void m() override;
virtual void method2() override;
};
void derived::n ()
{
}
=======
This has two errors -- one that "method2" is declared override but doesn't
in fact override; and two that "n" is defined but not declared in the class.
Compiling with g++ gives:
bapiya. g++ -c x.cc
g++ -c x.cc
x.cc:7:16: error: ‘virtual void derived::method2()’ marked ‘override’, but does
not override
virtual void method2() override;
^~~~~~~
x.cc:10:18: error: no ‘void derived::n()’ member function declared in class
‘derived’
void derived::n ()
^
For "method2" the location is where I'd expect.
However, for "n" the location comes after the close parens.
I think the "n" case should use the location of the identifier "n",
like the "method2" case does.
I'm using the system gcc on Fedora 25:
bapiya. gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221 (Red Hat 6.3.1-1)
