https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Wouldn't it penalize other code? E.g. if you have a TImode MEM and store > from something in XMM register, then it doesn't have to be offsetable and > can use even zero_extend in the address. Well, the testcase seems to come with -mno-sse, so maybe we check for that as well and assume things can be reloaded into an SSE reg otherwise. Guess I'll fire up a test.
