https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908

Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2017-03-13
          Component|target                      |tree-optimization
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Minimal test:

#include <stdarg.h>

void testva (int n, ...)
{
  va_list ap;

  _Complex int i = va_arg (ap, _Complex int);
}

The use of a _Complex type is required to exhibit the bug (plain old int and
double work fine).

The optimizer recognizes that the assignment to i is dead, but the side effects
of va_arg present it from similarly going dead, so we end up with:

testva (int n)
{
  char * ap;

  <bb 2> [100.00%]:
  VA_ARG (&ap, 0B, 0B);
  ap ={v} {CLOBBER};
  return;

}

which the gimplifier doesn't know what to do with for complex cases.

Not a target bug; changing to tree-optimization component.

Confirmed, btw.

Reply via email to