https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Le 10 juin 2017 à 19:40, pault at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> > a écrit : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 > > --- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Created attachment 41534 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41534&action=edit > An unpolished patch for the bug > > Dear All, > > Since I am not going to have any time to fix the array descriptor reform on > fortran-dev anytime soon, I have developed the attached. An extra 'span' field > has been added to the array descriptor, which is used for non-OOP pointer > operations. > > It needs a lot of cleaning up and thorough testing. It passes the regtests > except for: goacc/kernels-alias-4.f95; and graphite/pr14741.f90 The failure of graphite/pr14741.f90 is not related to your patch. Dominique > I can see why the former might fail but the latter has me completely > flummoxed. > > One of the most important parts of the cleanup will be to rework > trans.c:gfc_build_array_ref and some of the calls to it.I should include class > pointers in the scheme as well, just for completeness. > > Any feedback that you can give me would gratefully received. Let's at least > finally implement this last missing F95 feature. > > Cheers > > Paul > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
