https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> > I don't see this any longer.
>
> I think I might've seen this before, but I'll have to double-check the next
> time I bootstrap to make sure
The warnings I get from gengtype-lex.c when bootstrapping are now:
../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l: In function ‘int yylex(const char**)’:
gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
*yy_cp = '\0'; \
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:116:1: note: in expansion of macro
‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’
*yylval = XDUPVAR (const char, yytext, yyleng, yyleng + 1);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:113:1: note: here
"~" |
^~~~
gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
*yy_cp = '\0'; \
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:133:1: note: in expansion of macro
‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’
^
../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:131:1: note: here
"ENUM_BITFIELD"{WS}?"("{WS}?{ID}{WS}?")" {
^~~~
...which is no longer in a comment, but it still seems like there's some wrong
location information involved. Separate issue or the same thing?
