https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #21)
> Right and in particular don't get confused: --disable-libada does NOT
> disable the build of the Ada runtime in our builds, it only disables the
> automatic build when doing a 'make', but the Ada runtime is definitely built
> in this setup via an explicit make gnatlib, so that's a red herring. The
> sem_ch7.adb change is also
> clearly a red herring/not the root cause.
I'm doing a build with it disabled now (just trying to repeat your working
result too).
AFAIR, the difference is that the Ada runtime (when built during each stage) is
made as convenience (statically linked) libs, whereas libada is built shared -
so there will (probably) be different code-gen paths. ("Probably" is only
stated because x86-64 Darwin should always build PIC code for m64 so if it was
doing something different that would, indeed be an accident)
