https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70246
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mike Jarvis from comment #4)
> Created attachment 37984 [details]
> An alternate source that uses a custom Complex class
>
> OK, here is a version that rolls its own Complex class, rather than using
> the standard library's complex<double>. I stripped out the parts of that
> that aren't relevant for this, so hopefully this is small enough for you.
>
> A possible clue is that the warning goes away if Complex is implemented in
> terms of double _x and double _y (as the normal template version of
> std::complex does) rather than __complex__ double _z (as the specialization
> std::complex<double> does).
I can't reproduce this bug with current gcc; this source produces no warnings
for me when I compile it. Feel free to reopen if you still get the warning.
