https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82439
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |aarch64
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-10-06
Summary|[AArch64] Missing (x | y) |Missing (x | y) == x
|== x simplifications |simplifications
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
"(x | y) == x" is simpler than "(y & ~x) == 0" on the tree level. 2 gimple vs
3.
So converting it on the gimple level is not going to happen.
