https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82679

--- Comment #4 from olivier.delande.spam at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Sorry, I probably shouldn't have closed this.  I guess what we want to
> reject is 
> 
> typedef int T[10];
> _Atomic T a;
> 
> but not your example.

Indeed, that is exactly what I would expect (from my understanding of the
standard), and, as far as I can tell, that is what clang does. I have not
tested other compilers.

To anyone else is affected by this: a workaround (besides not using typedef for
such array types) is to wrap the atomic element type in a struct.

Thanks!

Reply via email to