https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628

--- Comment #35 from Sven <sven.koehler at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Sven from comment #34)
> That is to be
> expected, hence gcc should warn about the fact, and the address of a
> (potentially) unaligned int is assigned to a regular int* pointer.

Sorry, typo:
That is to be expected, hence gcc should warn about the fact that the address
of a (potentially) unaligned int is assigned to a regular int* pointer.

Reply via email to