https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #35 from Sven <sven.koehler at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Sven from comment #34) > That is to be > expected, hence gcc should warn about the fact, and the address of a > (potentially) unaligned int is assigned to a regular int* pointer. Sorry, typo: That is to be expected, hence gcc should warn about the fact that the address of a (potentially) unaligned int is assigned to a regular int* pointer.