https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549

--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This should be fixed now fairly well.  At this point there are not a lot of
major issues in our own libgfortran library. I will leave this bug report open
for a while if any issues arise.

Here is my latest profile. On my machine I am actuall getting slightly better
performance on trunk (8) vs. gfortran 6

Flat profile:

Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
  %   cumulative   self          
 time   seconds   seconds name    
 15.11      4.30     4.30 printf_positional
 14.65      8.47     4.17 __printf_fp_l
  7.13     10.50     2.03 __parse_one_specmb
  6.08     12.23     1.73 build_float_string
  4.16     13.42     1.19 formatted_transfer_scalar_write
  2.39     14.10     0.68 next_format0
  2.28     14.75     0.65 _IO_no_init
  2.23     15.38     0.64 __mpn_mul_1
  2.21     16.01     0.63 ____strtol_l_internal
  2.18     16.63     0.62 vfprintf
  1.86     17.16     0.53 __strchrnul_sse2
  1.79     17.67     0.51 _gfortrani_next_format
  1.77     18.18     0.51 _IO_str_init_static_internal
  1.76     18.68     0.50 __mpn_extract_double
  1.72     19.17     0.49 vsnprintf
  1.72     19.66     0.49 _IO_default_xsputn
  1.69     20.14     0.48 _int_malloc
  1.62     20.60     0.46 __memmove_sse2_unaligned_erms
  1.28     20.96     0.37 get_float_string
  1.12     21.28     0.32 _IO_padn
  1.02     21.57     0.29 __memset_sse2_unaligned
  1.02     21.86     0.29 __wmemset_sse2_unaligned
  0.91     22.12     0.26 flt128_ais

Reply via email to