https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Hauswedell <h2+bugs at fsfe dot org> --- I agree that the problem is related, I don't however think that solving PR82625 will solve the problem, as it would require me to multiversion every function in my part of the subgraph, or not? i.e.: given f() → g() if both f() and g() are multiversioned, PR82625 will result in only one dispatch, but given f() → g() → h() if only f() and h() are multiversioned, it would still to double-dispatch or not?
