https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On December 18, 2017 7:38:17 PM GMT+01:00, "dave.anglin at bell dot net"
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
>
>--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
>On 2017-12-18 10:37 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> Can you check if the attached helps?  It makes those local symbols
>defined
>> instead
>> (in the very first section we preserve, retaining the NULL name).
>The patch helps significantly.  However, the final link fails with the 
>message:
>
>ld: Unsatisfied hidden symbol "gnu_lto_v1". Symbol was referenced from 
>file /var/tmp//ccG1CcR8debugobj
>1 errors.
>collect2: fatal error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
>HP linker doesn't like undefined weak symbols.

Hmm, that sounds like a bug in the HP linker. I guess there's no chance of
getting Bugfixes for hpux issues? 

This was changed for the Solaris linker BTW. Which didn't like UNDEF globals
that cannot be resolved. Using weak should in theory work... 

>Symbol was defined in save_6.s as follows:
>
>         .section        .bss
>__gnu_lto_v1    .comm 1
>         .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.0 20171215 (experimental) [trunk 
>revision 255670]"
>
>It's not defined in save_6.exe.ltrans0.s.

Reply via email to