https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8 Regression] Revision |[8 Regression] there are
|r249019 breaks bootstrap on |cases where ld64 is not
|darwin |able to determine correct
| |atom boundaries from the
| |output GCC currently
| |produces
--- Comment #34 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33)
> The summary is now misleading as well. IMHO the bug shouldn't have been
> overloaded with the fallout of the original fix.
Updated summary based on:
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #29)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #28)
> > Bootstrap is fixed, but the fix did not please to Iain Sandoe.
>
> The fix allows bootstrap to proceed, but doesn't solve the underlying
> problem (which is that there are cases where the linker [ld64] is not able
> to determine correct atom boundaries from the output we currently produce
> from GCC).
>
> I will hopefully have some cycles for Darwin over the next month to address
> this and other issues.
