https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2018-06-18
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> As reported by user "jcoffland" on Hacker News:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16598071
>
> > One improvement I'd like to see is a simplified error message
> > for mismatched overloaded calls. If you make an overloaded call
> > for which the is no matching conversion or if the conversation is
> > ambiguous the compiler will "helpfully" dump a list of possibly
> > matching overloaded function signatures. The list can be hundreds
> > of lines long.
> >
> > For example, when you try to pipe a class to std::cout that
> > doesn't have an std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, const X &).
> > Perhaps instead of dumping the complete function signatures it
> > could show one function signature followed by a list of types
> > accepted as the second parameter. Since the signatures are
> > otherwise the same. Such improvements could also reduce
> > template error spew.
>
> I hope to have a look at this in the GCC 9 timeframe, so filing this here.
OK, changing status to ASSIGNED then
