https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #19)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #11)
> > (In reply to comment #10)
> > > However, with so many lines of legacy code out there using bit-filed that
> > > have
> > > been proven to work, it doesn't make sense to revisit/modify them. Would
> > > it
> > > be possible for gcc to provide a -Wbitfield-conversion flag in new
> > > releases
> > > and make 39170 an enhancement (preferably high priority)?
> >
> > Seriously, I am not the "maintainer" of GCC diagnostics
>
> That's David Malcolm; adding him on cc
...and since he's now made himself the assignee, changing status to ASSIGNED
