https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-08-11 3:31 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846 > > --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Does hppa64 really not have native atomic ops for sizeof(void*) ? Sadly, it lacks an atomic compare and exchange operation. The mutex support might have some form of kernel support but I don't know what it is. I've been working on atomic load and store support. > > I guess we need to use a mutex here, as I don't want libstdc++ to depend on > libatomic. > Yes. Dave
