https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86997
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Don't write weird code?
Either of these works fine and is obvious what it is supposed to do:
NoDestructor b;
NoDestructor b{};
The original is weird. Is it trying to construct an 'a' object and pass that to
the NoDestructor? Or just default construct the NoDestructor object?
