https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87155

--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hm, while I understand the intent here, I wonder if clang is succeeding by
accident?  The std is not completely clear whether all anonymous namespaces may
share the same unique identifier or not.  We do, and hence fail here for the
same reasons as-if the two anonymous namespaces were named 'bob'.  Will ask.

Reply via email to