https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- But the Comment 5 testcase actually started ICEing with r216750, which makes it a dup of PR80864.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- But the Comment 5 testcase actually started ICEing with r216750, which makes it a dup of PR80864.