https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175
--- Comment #8 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> --- Hi Jonathan Do you agree this warning output should be changed to clarify? I understand your reply about it being non-POD when a C++ STL string is added. Which adds the implicitly-defined copy constructor. Should it not say "implicitly-defined copy constructor for 'struct info'"? instead of "this function" ? Think also better for GCC to show the typedef 'info_t' - would you agree? GCC might be outputting a lot of unnecessary output... Jonny
