https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88695

--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot 
com> ---
It's DR#316 that's relevant here (where the committee agreed with my 
interpretation that implies this example is valid, and reiterated their 
intent not to fix issues with unprototyped functions in the standard), not 
DR#317.

Reply via email to