https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> GCC makes the integer type of the bit-field in question "unsigned:4".
> See DR#315 (also, see the line of C90 DRs that led to the wording changes
> in C99 relating to types of bit-fields, references in
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00192.html>).
Thanks for the explanation.
