https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88731
Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2) > GCC makes the integer type of the bit-field in question "unsigned:4". > See DR#315 (also, see the line of C90 DRs that led to the wording changes > in C99 relating to types of bit-fields, references in > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00192.html>). Thanks for the explanation.