https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You mean inefficient, right? The effects are correct as far as I can see.
- [Bug c++/89317] New: Ineffective code fro... bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com
- [Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffe... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffe... bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com
- [Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffe... glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffe... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
