https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85250
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-02-12
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with the simplified test case below. Not a regression.
$ cat pr85250.C && gcc -S -Wall pr85250.C
template <class T, class U> struct X;
template <class T> struct X<T, T> { typedef T U; };
struct A {
template<typename T, typename X<T, int>::U = 0>
operator T();
};
int main()
{
A a;
return 1 + a;
}
pr85250.C: In function ‘int main()’:
pr85250.C:12:12: error: no match for ‘operator+’ (operand types are ‘int’ and
‘A’)
12 | return 1 + a;
| ~ ^ ~
| | |
| int A
