https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89537
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With this patch
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c
index fb67d905acd..d9073d7c23d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -4246,7 +4246,7 @@ resolve_args (vec<tree, va_gc> *args, tsubst_flags_t
complain)
error ("invalid use of void expression");
return NULL;
}
- else if (invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (arg->exp.locus, arg, complain))
+ else if (invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (EXPR_LOCATION (arg), arg, complain))
return NULL;
}
return args;
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 1db9333b5ff..1bf9ad88141 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -2562,7 +2562,8 @@ build_class_member_access_expr (cp_expr object, tree
member,
type = unknown_type_node;
/* Note that we do not convert OBJECT to the BASELINK_BINFO
base. That will happen when the function is called. */
- result = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, type, object, member, NULL_TREE);
+ result = build3_loc (input_location, COMPONENT_REF, type, object,
member,
+ NULL_TREE);
}
else if (TREE_CODE (member) == CONST_DECL)
{
we get
89537.C:9:18: error: invalid use of non-static member function ‘void B<
<template-parameter-1-1>, <template-parameter-1-2>, <template-parameter-1-3>,
<template-parameter-1-4> >::keys() [with _Tp = int; <template-parameter-1-2> =
int; <template-parameter-1-3> = A<int>; <template-parameter-1-4> = A<int>]’
9 | : keys(p1->keys), values(p1->values) {}
| ~~~~^~~~
89537.C:28:8: note: declared here
28 | void keys();
| ^~~~
so I guess it'd be an improvement.
