https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89536
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Isn't that different though? I mean, even if we have int type and have [0, > 1] range and have a check that the value isn't 0, then it must be 1. Then I don't understand the problem in the BIT_NOT_EXPR case: we h
