https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #24 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> --- Created attachment 45910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45910&action=edit gcc-8-pr89585-warn.patch (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > Created attachment 45904 [details] > gcc8-pr89585.patch > > The 8.x version would be like this. Depending on whether this will remain an error in GCC 9, would it make sense to have a warning for file scope asm volatile, like so? (Minimally tested so far. If it makes sense, I can re-do it based on the updated GCC 9 patch.)
