https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |build
                 CC|                            |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A user on IRC reported similar errors for GCC 9.1.0:

g++ -mlp64 -std=gnu++98   -DUSE_LIBUNWIND_EXCEPTIONS  -g -DIN_GCC    
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -static-libstdc++
-static-libgcc  -o cc1 c/c-lang.o c-family/stub-objc.o attribs.o c/c-errors.o
c/c-decl.o c/c-typeck.o
c/c-convert.o c/c-aux-info.o c/c-objc-common.o c/c-parser.o c/c-fold.o
c/gimple-parser.o c-family/c-common.o c-family/c-cppbuiltin.o c-family/c-dump.o
c-family/c-format.o c-family/c-gimplify.o c-family/c-indentation.o
c-family/c-lex.o c-family/c-omp.o c-family/c-opts.o c-family/c-pch.o
c-family/c-ppoutput.o c-family/c-pragma.o c-family/c-pretty-print.o
c-family/c-semantics.o c-family/c-ada-spec.o c-family/c-ubsan.o
c-family/known-headers.o c-family/c-attribs.o c-family/c-warn.o
c-family/c-spellcheck.o ia64-c.o default-c.o \
           cc1-checksum.o libbackend.a main.o libcommon-target.a libcommon.a
../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a libcommon.a
../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libbacktrace/.libs/libbacktrace.a
../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a  
-L/wrk/ia64-9.1.0//lib -L/wrk/ia64-9.1.0//lib -L/wrk/ia64-9.1.0//lib -lmpc
-lmpfr -lgmp   -L./../zlib -lz -lunwind
ld: The value 0xfffffffffda61f70 does not fit when applying the relocation
PCREL21B for symbol ".text" at offset 0x2a2 in section index 622 of file
libbackend.a[wide-int-range.o]
426 errors.
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


Dave, are you aware of anybody testing ia64-hpux?
Should it be deprecated if nobody is maintaining it?

Reply via email to