https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90545
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra <amodra at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: amodra Date: Tue May 21 13:36:04 2019 New Revision: 271464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271464&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR90545, gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-splats-floatdouble.c fails I figure a tweak to register_move_cost is better than sprinkling ?s in instruction operand alternatives. PR target/90545 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_register_move_cost): Increase power9 direct move cost. * testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-splats-floatdouble.c: Correct comments and rename functions to suit parameters. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-splats-floatdouble.c
