https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Hi Martin, Is this for the slowdown or for the wrong-code issue? To get another view, from a gdb seesion of the compiler: call debug(expr) call debug(fsym) a look at expr->symtree->n.sym (I think call debug(expr->symtree->n.sym) will also work, a look at expr->ref (follow a few pointers) a look at fsym->as (also follow non-zero pointers). Also, if you have call foo(...,a, ...) you can put print *,shape(a) print *,size(a) print *,is_contiguous(a) into the source, run it and see what you get. Also, look into the callee if there is a bounds violation - what is the dummy argumet declared as on the calee's side? Maybe you could also put subroutine foo (...., a, ...) print *,shape(a) print *,size(a) print *,is_contiguous(a) into the source code and paste the output. Regards Thomas
