https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90571
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Romeo <vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com> --- > I wonder how the "original" testcase looked like - the one in this bug is probably simplified from real-world code? This is what the original author of the code (Filipp Gelman) said: > I was reviewing some code that checked configuration. The configuration > struct has several functions taking no arguments and returning bool. The > value of an enum determined which of these was called. > I thought that the choice of which member function to call depends only on > the enum and not on anything else in the configuration, so I tried splitting > selecting the member function from calling it. > This code looks much closer to what I reviewed: https://godbolt.org/z/L_W_oi > The author wrote `test1`. I considered suggesting `test2`, but was surprised > by it not optimizing to the same code.
