https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91203

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org          |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Diane Meirowitz from comment #0)
> I can capture ASan error messages with a function set in 
> 
>   __asan_set_error_report_callback
> 
> Unfortunately this does nothing for any messages coming from LeakSanitizer,
> even though it is included in -fsanitize=address. This is a serious problem
> because the large code that I'm working on redirects stderr to /dev/null, so
> it took a while to even realize that there must be some leaks in this code.
> Yes we can set LSAN_OPTIONS to log_path=..., but what we really want to do
> is to be able to capture the leak errors just like we are capturing the
> buffer overflow messages and redirect them to internal handlers.
> 
> First of all, this must be documented.
> 
> Second it would be really awesome to have LeakSanitizer call the callback
> function set in __asan_set_error_report_callback. If this doesn't make sense
> for LSan, please provide __lsan_set_error_report_callback instead.

You are right, LSAN does not provide such a callback. Please create an upstream
feature request here:
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues

> 
> I can attach a code sample, but it's pretty easy to create one.

Reply via email to