https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91260
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is not a bug. The names are still reserved for use by the implementation,
so we can do whatever we want with them. Libstdc++ chooses to use those names
to define classes identical to the ones of the same name defined by previous
standards.
Removing those classes would have ABI impact, and so I am opposed to removing
them.
