https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88962
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looking at GCC's output:
[ cutting away irrelevant (irrelevant here) dot ops: ]
geta:
stwu 1,-16(1)
mflr 0
bcl 20,31,$+8
mflr 3
lwz 9,0(3)
add 3,3,9
stw 0,20(1)
addi 3,3,a@got@tlsld
stw 30,8(1)
bl __tls_get_addr(a@tlsld)@plt
lwz 0,20(1)
lwz 30,8(1)
addis 3,3,a@dtprel@ha
mtlr 0
addi 3,3,a@dtprel@l
lwz 3,0(3)
addi 1,1,16
blr
getb:
stwu 1,-16(1)
mflr 0
bcl 20,31,$+8
mflr 3
lwz 9,0(3)
add 3,3,9
stw 0,20(1)
addi 3,3,b@got@tlsgd
stw 30,8(1)
bl __tls_get_addr(b@tlsgd)@plt
lwz 0,20(1)
lwz 30,8(1)
lwz 3,0(3)
mtlr 0
addi 1,1,16
blr
tlsld and tlsgd have quite different semantics, so this isn't a real surprise?
What do you think the compiler should do differently?
(Closing as invalid, please reopen if you want further action).
