https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91425
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6) > Maybe we should make "is this an ordered comparison" separate from the > actual comparison code. I was considering having a single .IFN_FENV_CMP (a, b, opts) where opts would have one bit to say if it is true when a and b are unordered, one for a<b, one for a==b, one for a>b, one or two to know if it may (or must) trap / set exception flags, etc.
