https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87150
Richard Smith <richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo | |.co.uk --- Comment #22 from Richard Smith <richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #20) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #19) > > And now P1155/P1825 removes that text, so in C++20 mode the original > > testcase needs to call the move constructor again. Marek, I don't see > > P1825R0 in cxx-status.html, was there a reason not to add it? > > No, I followed clang's table but they're missing that one. I'll fix that & > open a PR for P1825R0. FYI, it is in Clang's table, but I put it in the C++11 features list since it's a DR and we're considering it to retroactively apply to C++11's addition of move semantics.