https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #13) > These functions have to be expanded inline, unconditionally; there are no > library functions they can reliably fall back on in general. Ugh, yes. There probably *should* be, but oh well.
