https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > for y >= 0.0 the result is unspecified? NaN >= 0.0 is false, but even if it was unspecified, the implication would still be true. (In reply to Nikita Lisitsa from comment #2) > If by 'isless(y, 0.0)' you mean 'y < 0.f', He is talking about the standard macro isless, defined in math.h.
