https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92308
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92308 > > --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Very few micro-architectures would benefit from auto-inc style addressing in a > sequence like this. I'd expect embedded in-order designs to benefit here with -Os (mostly with larger sequences where the immediate offset doesn't fit the encoding space for a comparable size instruction)
