https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230
--- Comment #7 from meissner at linux dot ibm.com --- On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 07:02:32AM +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93230 > > --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Does it make sense to fold vec_extract directly into BIT_FIELD_REF in > altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin for constants? > Or even in rs6000_fold_builtin ? > > It seems like a lot of the builtins should be fold directly to gimple > versions. Sure if somebody does the work. But note, vec_extract does support variable element numbers.
